This table provides metadata for the actual indicator available from Kenya statistics closest to the corresponding global SDG indicator. Please note that even when the global SDG indicator is fully available from Kenyan statistics, this table should be consulted for information on national methodology and other Kenyan-specific metadata information.
Goal |
Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all |
---|---|
Target |
Target 6.5: By 2030, implement integrated water resources management at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation as appropriate |
Indicator |
Indicator 6.5.1: Degree of integrated water resources management |
Metadata update |
May 2024 |
Related indicators |
1.4.1, 1.4.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 4.7.1, 5.5.1, 5.5.2, 6.6.1, 6.a.1, 6.b.1, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.5.1, 8.5.2, 10.2.1, 11.3.1, 11.3.2, 13.2.1, 13.2.2, 15.9.1, 16.3.1, 16.3.2, 16.5.1, 16.5.2, 16.7.1, 16.7.2 |
Organisation |
KENYA NATIONAL BURAU OF STATISTICS |
Contact person(s) |
Senior Manager |
Contact organisation unit |
Food Monitoring, Nutrition and Environment Statistics |
Contact person function |
Compilation of Environment and Natural Resources statistics |
Contact phone |
+254-735-004-401, +254-202-911-000, +254-202-911-001 |
Contact mail |
P.O. Box 30266–00100 GPO NAIROBI |
Contact email |
dps@knbs.or.ke |
Definition and concepts |
Definition: Indicator 6.5.1 is ‘degree of integrated water resources management implementation’. It measures the stages of development and implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM), on a scale of 0 to 100, in six categories (see Rationale section). The indicator score is calculated from a country survey with 33 questions, with each question scored on the same scale of 0-100 The Indicator measures progress towards target 6.5: “By 2030, implement integrated water resources management at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation as appropriate”. The target supports the equitable and efficient use of water resources, which is essential for social and economic development, as well as environmental sustainability. Concepts: The concept of IWRM is measured in 4 main sections, each representing key dimension of IWRM: 1. . Enabling environment: Policies, laws and plans to support IWRM implementation. 2. Institutions and participation: The range and roles of political, social, economic and administrative institutions and other stakeholder groups that help to support implementation. 3. Management instruments: The tools and activities that enable decision-makers and users to make rational and informed choices between alternative actions. 4. Financing: Budgeting and financing for water resources development and management. |
Unit of measure |
percent |
Classifications |
• Classification of inland water bodies: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Family/Detail/2002 • Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (UN M49 classification of countries and regions) |
Data sources |
Ministry of Water irrigation and Sanitation-SDG pilot report |
Data collection method |
A broad stakeholder engagement process was undertaken to help increase stakeholder participation and ownership of water management and decision-making processes, and make the findings more robust and useful for further discussions and planning. SDG 6.5.1 Focal Points are asked to fill in the Reporting Process Form in Annex C to increase transparency and stakeholder confidence in the results at all levels. |
Data collection calendar |
Data is collected approximately every 3-4 years |
Data release calendar |
Data is released approximately 3 months after the close of each data collection round |
Data providers |
Ministry of Water Irrigation and Sanitation |
Data compilers |
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics |
Institutional mandate |
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics is mandated to collect,compile,analyze,publish and disseminate official statistics for public use. |
Rationale |
The indicator provides a direct progress measurement of the first part of Target 6.5 “…implement integrated water resources management at all levels …”. The indicator score provides an easy and understandable way of measuring progress towards the target, with ‘0’ interpreted as no implementation of IWRM, and ‘100’ interpreted as IWRM being fully implemented. |
Method of computation |
1. The survey contains 33 questions divided into the four main sections described above. 2. Each question is given a score between 0 and 100, in increments of 10, guided by threshold descriptions for the following 6 categories: • Very low (0) • Low (20) • Medium-low (40) • Medium-high (60) • High (80) • Very high (100) Where question is not applicable, n/a can be selected as a reply, providing adequate Last updated: 2022-12-16 explanation. Note that more question-specific guidance is provided for each threshold for each question, to ensure objective and comparable results. 3. The un-weighted average of the question scores within each of the four sections is calculated to give a score of 0 – 100 for each section, rounded to the nearest whole number. Questions with response n/a are omitted from calculation. 4. The section scores (rounded to the nearest whole number), are averaged (un-weighted), and rounded to the nearest whole number, to give the indicator score, expressed as a number between 0 and 100. |
Validation |
There is a dedicated SDG 6.5.1 Help Desk for ensuring the quality of the statistical results. Firstly, the data goes through national quality assurance and approval processes, before being submitted to the Help Desk. The Help Desk then undertakes the Quality Assurance procedure described in section 4.j. All issues are discussed between the Help Desk and the Focal Point(s). Only when all issues are resolved, are the data finalised and entered into the Help Desk Database. The data is then submitted to the UNEP SDG focal point, who collates all indicator data for which UNEP is the Custodian Agency, where a further quality check is undertaken, prior to submission to the SDGs Indicator Database. |
Methods and guidance available to countries for the compilation of the data at the national level |
1. National focal points selected by each country. 2. National focal points are responsible for coordinating a national process to engage governmental and non-governmental stakeholders, as appropriate in the context of each country, to develop draft responses and finalise responses. This may be via email, workshops, and online notices. 3. The following guidance materials are available for national focal points in 7 languages (English), at http://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org/about http://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org: the survey (MS Word); a detailed monitoring guide; and a PowerPoint presentation and video recording. In addition, focal points may access the following country-level materials at http://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org/countrydatabase: the 2017 and 2020 baseline surveys and 2- page results summaries (for 186 countries); and 2017 and 2020 workshop reports (for 36 countries) from https://www.gwp.org/en/sdg6support/sdgmap/. 4. In addition, an “SDG 6.5.1 Facilitator’s Training Course” is available online via https://www.gwp.org/en/sdg6support/consultations/where-we-are/stage-1-activities/ , through the SDG 6 IWRM Support Programme. 5. A more comprehensive “IWRM Stage 1 Support Package” is available for a limited number of countries (approximately 60 countries in 2020) see https://www.gwp.org/en/sdg6support/consultations/where-we-are/stage-1-activities/. The Support Package includes seed funding to engage a Facilitator to support the stakeholder consultation process. Extensive explanations are provided in the monitoring guide and in the survey itself. The survey contains: an overall introduction and explanation; a glossary; an introduction and glossary in each of the four sections; threshold descriptions for six thresholds for each question; and a number of footnotes to explain aspects of questions or threshold descriptions. All materials can be downloaded from http://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org. In addition, a dedicated Help Desk is available to provide assistance at all times. |
Quality management |
The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics is ISO certified based on 9001:2015 Standard requirements. The processes of compilation, production, publication and dissemination of data, including quality control, are carried out following the methodological framework and standards established by the KNBS, in compliance with the Internationally acceptable standards |
Quality assurance |
The KNBS adheres to Kenya Statistical Quality Assurance Framework (KesQAF) that underlines principles to be assured in managing the statistical production processes and output. Data consistency and quality checks are conducted through Technical Working Groups (TWGs) before publication and dissemination. |
Quality assessment |
The processes of compilation, production, publication and dissemination of data, including quality control are subjected to a set criteria and standards to ensure conformity. |
Comparability/deviation from international standards |
The data is highly comparable, though not identical, to previous versions. Some minor amendments have been made following a review process, and noteworthy changes are described in footnotes for relevant questions. |
References and Documentation | |
Metadata last updated | Aug 28, 2025 |